Advertisement
I kinda like the first one, though apparently I've forgotten most of it.
I kinda like this one, though it gets bogged down by some exposition lecture. At least it's done by a robot with a funny accent. I've taken off my plausible continuity hat and burned it (I can always get one when summer is over) so to say anything else about the movie's lacks would be contradictory. But I'll give it to you, there are plenty.
Ebert made it sound like it was mechanical mayhem pastiche from beginning to end. That it sounded like a bag of pots and pans banging away. I was hoping for that. Didn't really get it. I guess we'll always have Tetsuo!
If there is any evidence that the liberals control Hollywood, this movie is not it. The taser for laughs stuff was a bummer. Of course it is a war movie and conservative politics tend to be tribal and brutal so why the heck not. That's what war is anyway. I've got some warrior in me and the transformers are cool warriors. My dog got a new nickname tonight - Optimus Piglet!
We'll always have Star Trek!
I kinda like this one, though it gets bogged down by some exposition lecture. At least it's done by a robot with a funny accent. I've taken off my plausible continuity hat and burned it (I can always get one when summer is over) so to say anything else about the movie's lacks would be contradictory. But I'll give it to you, there are plenty.
Ebert made it sound like it was mechanical mayhem pastiche from beginning to end. That it sounded like a bag of pots and pans banging away. I was hoping for that. Didn't really get it. I guess we'll always have Tetsuo!
If there is any evidence that the liberals control Hollywood, this movie is not it. The taser for laughs stuff was a bummer. Of course it is a war movie and conservative politics tend to be tribal and brutal so why the heck not. That's what war is anyway. I've got some warrior in me and the transformers are cool warriors. My dog got a new nickname tonight - Optimus Piglet!
We'll always have Star Trek!
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, June 24, 2009 - 11:22 PMbut I bet there were plenty of gratuitous shots of Megan Fox....
LOL
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Thu, June 25, 2009 - 1:52 PMThe closest I plan on getting to this movie (after having seen the first one) is the orgy of chubby pubescent males crowding the entrance to the theater I was exiting after the 7:45 showing of Drag Me to Hell. (which i enjoyed) Seeing a movie at 12:01 with this crowd would've been a little too close to making my torn ticket stub a visceral reality. -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Thu, June 25, 2009 - 2:56 PMSeveral reviewers have noted that the Transformers are designed with monochrome palettes and baffling structural complexity. They're hard to parse when they're just standing around by themselves, much less when they're fighting one another.
This probably dissuades me more from seeing it than any other criticism layered at this movie -- if the action scenes don't even make visual sense, what's the point? -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Sun, June 28, 2009 - 9:32 PMInteresting point, I do remember the fight scenes in the first one being confusing - not knowing which robot was which. -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 1:40 AMI also have a hard time telling the good guys from the bad guys. Maybe they can where black and white cowboy hats. -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 1:44 AMJust read the bumper stickers
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Sun, June 28, 2009 - 9:31 PMI liked the first one until the robots started talking. The cheesiness of their dialogue mostly killed it for me. -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Tue, June 30, 2009 - 10:15 AMI love the way the robots talk.
I feel that the Transformers themselves are a very charismatic brand. I never watched them when I was young (I was too old) but I find Optimus Prime to be very intriguing. Like Batman, I think the brand is strong, charismatic. The first Batman movie was a complete piece of trash yet the power of the brand guaranteed big box office. Transformers is the same thing, I think. This movie is one of the worst reviewed of the summer and not all that good, particularly it's off putting politics. The brand is strong and charismatic the movie itself doesn't matter that much. (I'm just talking in terms of $$). Batman was the same thing and possibly Star Trek too though that is a different beast itself.
The studios probably don't really understand that so much with these two brands. My argument would be since the brands are so strong why don't we make a good movie.
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 5:47 PM" liked the first one until the robots started talking."
Actually, the idealist cheezy blabber is dead on for the old Transformer cartoons so is in keeping with the theme. No wonder Bay picked it up. :-)
Fortunately, just as when I was a kid I tend to let that roll outta my ears in favor of hokey cheesy one liners and cool friggin' robots who can change into regular machinery. Never gets old (even as I do;)
-
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 1:46 AMDecent popcorn movie. The mom cracked me up. I thought Megan Fox played a pretty strong character, not just a Fay Wray type. I enjoyed the twin robots, and the little robot Megan fox adopted. John Turturro was wonderful also. -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 10:25 PMI liked it. But of course, I'm pretty tolerant to "popcorn" explosion movies. I don't expect Shakespeare.
It wasn't perfect - they could've slowed-down the fight scenes a few frames (the exception would be the super slo-mo scenes - that were in stark contrast to most of the frenetic action - but still kinda cool), and the military mobilization in Act III was really drawn out more than it should've been. Also there were a couple of loose ends that weren't addressed *SPOILER* (i.e. the two remaining shards of the Allspark that nobody even cared about in favor of that new device, the Matrix...and the little RC Decepticon that Megan captured just sort of disappeared).
I liked the twin robots. I don't agree with the hubbub about them being racist caricatures - no more than I did the same hubbub about the aliens in "Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace" being the same.
Turturro (as usual) was great. His own character's story arc was sort of its own "revenge of the fallen" - or at the very least: " the redemption of the disgraced".
Also - unlike many critics, etc. - I laughed at a lot of the jokes. -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 10:41 PM"little RC Decepticon that Megan captured"
Yeah, I was wondering what happened to him also. Just when he gets interesting, he disappears from the story.
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Mon, July 6, 2009 - 6:09 PM>Also - unlike many critics, etc. - I laughed at a lot of the jokes.<
Yep, I found myself sniggering at all the right places. Once again found myself loving the parents (brownies...lol), LOVED John T, and found the big dangling wrecker balls on the Devastator just had me giggling for the rest of the movie.
I could see where Megan Fox made some snide remarks about acting in a Michael Bay movie, though. I'm surprised M Bay even let her have a dialogue instead of just jiggling in front of the screen w/ her lips poked out. It got a little over the top.
-
-
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 1, 2009 - 5:39 AMPolysics - Domo Arigato Mr Roboto www.youtube.com/watch -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 15, 2009 - 2:04 PMStill not quite sure why the Twins spoke Ebonics, or pidgin, or whatever. -
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Wed, July 15, 2009 - 4:15 PMMaybe because Michael Bay has the racial sensitivity of Jeff Sessions?
-
-
-
Re: Transformers: Movie In Disguise
Mon, July 27, 2009 - 8:17 PMIs Transformers 2 Racist? movieblog.ugo.com/movies/is...s-2-racist